Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What if you solve it, find it, and leave clue(s) out for immunity in publishing?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    *hypothetical*
    Correct, it's the ones who DONT solve it that the solver has to worry about...
    Questing song: Iron Maiden's "Quest for Fire" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ppwIZ0EnXg

    Comment


    • #17
      I'm taking it all and leaving nothing for any of you. Best of Luck!!!

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Vaquero View Post
        I'm taking it all and leaving nothing for any of you. Best of Luck!!!
        Hahaha! Good answer! But then I cannot wish you luck on that
        Questing song: Iron Maiden's "Quest for Fire" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ppwIZ0EnXg

        Comment


        • #19
          I think that the finder could post 6 clues and clearly show why they deserved the box. And I mean without saying anything like "I think this is Brown," "this place looks like marvel gaze," or "surely this must be the wood or canyon to be in." The rest of the Chase community would know why, but not so much how in the later stages. I think you could hand people the 6 and they'd still take a year to reach a community consensus, but years to truly believe individually what the end is. Of course, some, would never believe.
          Last edited by 5-leaf Blaze; 04-08-2019, 01:16 PM.
          Questing song: Iron Maiden's "Quest for Fire" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ppwIZ0EnXg

          Comment


          • #20
            You can't use luck where I'm going.

            Comment


            • #21
              Then again, You can't really use anything at all where I'm going. So I guess this is it.

              Comment


              • #22
                Vaquero... why TH did you ban yourself?
                Questing song: Iron Maiden's "Quest for Fire" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ppwIZ0EnXg

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by 5-leaf Blaze View Post
                  Vaquero... why TH did you ban yourself?
                  I gotta nickel that says he doesn't answer . . .
                  " It will be discovered by someone who has read the clues successfully." ff

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Yeah, he can't.
                    Questing song: Iron Maiden's "Quest for Fire" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ppwIZ0EnXg

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Old Pilot View Post

                      (With all due respect to Mr. Fenn,) I wouldn't rely/depend on that happening.
                      I'd say there is an exact accounting of the chest and all contents to be gotten from a Trust Lawyer. Remember people, Forrest did all this treasure chest collecting after he had sold the Gallery. Doesn't anyone think Forrest would do proper estate planning ? Finder will be a beneficiary in Forrest and Peggy Trust whatever the name is.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by garnets
                        Why would the finder be named a beneficiary? By definition "The Finder" would already have the chest in their possession.
                        The beneficiary is a title for the finder as of course the persons name is not known. So Forrest would have put into the trust documents that the chest and contents goes to the finder unnamed. But he could also list another enticing treat for the finder. It would all be for tax purposes. Finder/beneficiary would only have to pay taxes on the difference between amount Forrest paid and what the finder sells for. Other than that Forrest would have to pay a gift tax. I don't think he would have done that. That's why Forrest keeps saying it is out of his hands now. To me that indicates the Trust is an Irrevocable Trust. And BTW, Forrest could have put instructions in the chest that finder must contact Trustee within 30 days of finding chest.
                        Last edited by TreasureCodex; 04-08-2019, 10:37 PM.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by TreasureCodex View Post

                          The beneficiary is a title for the finder as of course the persons name is not known. So Forrest would have put into the trust documents that the chest and contents goes to the finder unnamed. But he could also list another enticing treat for the finder. It would all be for tax purposes. Finder/beneficiary would only have to pay taxes on the difference between amount Forrest paid and what the finder sells for. Other than that Forrest would have to pay a gift tax. I don't think he would have done that. That's why Forrest keeps saying it is out of his hands now. To me that indicates the Trust is an Irrevocable Trust. And BTW, Forrest could have put instructions in the chest that finder must contact Trustee within 30 days of finding chest.
                          Do you think that's the surprise? He spoke about..
                          https://youtu.be/mtLbE3IUY2U " If you know where the treasure is ...You should go get it."

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Wraith14u View Post

                            Do you think that's the surprise? He spoke about..
                            I do think there is a good chance of a better enticement.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X