Originally posted by Cary_Galloway
View Post
The objective solve does not exist for Wyoming. You must accept the possibility that the ending is staged....that is until you have objective findings that substantiate the claim for that location.....findings that aren't rooted in subjectivity, highly suspect claims and pictures, etc.... The solve for that location must be objective.....it is a requirement for objectivity. The ending (pics, stick, etc....)....are not good enough and are highly suspect as a rouse. (Yes, perpetrated by Forrest/Jack/whoever). This in a nutshell is what a large portion of the community knows. Why do they know it? Because there is not objectivity in proving location and the 1 blaze out of 10 billion, and the end result is the conclusion that it is not valid (highly suspect evidence). Simple. A true solve doesn't start with the pics of the stick and the chest.....those are the icing on the cake that finish it....not begin it.
IMO, anything that came out of the Forrest camp after the recovery is suspect. (You know why). And so, we are left with what can be proved regarding the solve for the poem. That, begins with location, not with the ending evidence (findings) and claims that are in-situ for 9mh (highly suspect). I simply encourage you to objectively consider these things regarding Wyoming so you understand the difference between what is, and what is wished for. Objectivity is not a bad thing.....
Comment