Originally posted by Cary_Galloway
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Forrest Fenn Loved the Nine Mile Hole
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Cary_Galloway View Post
yeah its too bad Jack found the chest at 9mh.
That must make you mad.Last edited by Knowledge; 05-19-2023, 05:30 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Knowledge View Post
I will bet you Forrest Fenn did not put it there and no I am not angry. I got to speak to Forrest and I do not lie like others do and take away everything Forrest Fenn did becasue someone tried to play games. You seem very bitter for some reason, and you sure are pushing this like you want it to be true. It is not your solve and it makes f look like a dumb hick. I do know there were a few out to get f becasue they felt he did them wrong. Maybe you are part of that crew or a Rooster friend. If you really think Jack solved TTOTC lucky for you no one knows who you are, or do they?
Stop living in your fantasy world and accept reality.
Sorry you were wrong.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cary_Galloway View Post
Oh 9mh is the last. It is the end. Game over.
You will see. You can be wrong as long as you want. That is up to you.
IMO, these voices and themes that we are continually hearing are the result of speculation, insider information, or fantasy. Shilo - insider information. Speculation - the many trips, the stick and nook. Fantasy - "I want to believe." But there is a difference between subjectivity and objectivity.....
IMO, it is likely that we will get the insider information - the book - and it will potentially substantiate the speculation and fantasy. If, in anyway, shape or form...these "predictions" come true, then my opinion...at this point, will be accurate. IMO, the end result of "new information" will likely be a blending of these things designed to bolster subterfuge....in a nice and tidy package that seemingly answers all the questions....about the winning solve, and LOCATION.
But, IMO....it is likely that if these scenarios do come to pass.....what we would be witnessing is the continuation of the intentions of the architect. By accident, or design....the chase is exactly where Forrest had intended it to be. (More than likely-design). Where it will be....after the community receives the "pending revelations," will be.....again the result of where the architect.....had envisioned the chase to be. (IMO).
IMO......there is a high probability that there may be leanings that support a Wyoming solve that will go to Wyoming in the book, new information/whatever. However.....did it ever occur to the reader that Forrest has in reserve-something of..... "a cover story?" And as smart as readers are....what would be the purpose of the architect to contrive such a notion? IMO, Wyoming is in the bag so to speak and the new information....from Forrest (perhaps) will likely render a plausible explanation, but it may be that it will not "close the book" on the matter. My speculative comment....in this thread....ends by saying that Forrest may have a card up his sleeve yet....and that is the joker, and not the Ace. (But they are equivalents). If the new book/revelations/etc, can't answer for location, show the W/M, answer for Brown, show the 9-Clues, etc....or disclose the "winning solve" for that matter.....then the information under the guise of "You will see" would all be "plausible," but also.....assailable too. Maybe Forrest has a solve for Wyoming, maybe not, we'll see. And when you said "You will see," that is what we expect......
But you also say that 9MH is the location....and yet you fail in proving it. So how credible are you, and how credible will the forthcoming information be? It will likely be coming from insiders......We can't put faith in your claim of "You will see," when there is nothing to put faith in.....regarding 9MH/Yellowstone as location, see? Yeah the affidavits and what have you. Well, you can't say that Forrest is not committed to not revealing where he hid the chest...and protecting his estate, his legacy, etc..... Prove location....Wyoming. Don't rely on the subterfuge of "we decided to reveal it was recovered in Wyoming."
Wyoming (location) can't be proved save those things under the guise of your comment and "You will see," That is not proof in the court of public opinion.....at all. Possession is nine tenths the law.....subterfuge? The drum beats on. There is a discrepancy and a difference between what is......and what you are leveraging with future information forthcoming......"You will see."
If you can't prove Wyoming...then it is not in Wyoming where the "winning solve" resides...and even if Forrest comes out and provides new data (insider information).....Wyoming will always be assailable....not bullet proof....and that, IMO....is by the design of the architect too.Last edited by trueyeti; 05-19-2023, 06:12 PM.
Comment
-
Cary - You have said there is so much evidence for 9MH but have never gone before the KPRO searcher court to present any of it. It makes one wonder if you were just so impressed with Riudy's carrot top and followed him all over. If so, f gives that a grade of 0 because you lacked everything. Or, did you choose it because of a stick that matches billions of others? If so we understand where you are coming from when you post.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hear me all View PostCary - You have said there is so much evidence for 9MH but have never gone before the KPRO searcher court to present any of it. It makes one wonder if you were just so impressed with Riudy's carrot top and followed him all over. If so, f gives that a grade of 0 because you lacked everything. Or, did you choose it because of a stick that matches billions of others? If so we understand where you are coming from when you post.
Show me another stick that matches the one in the chest.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cary_Galloway View Post
Every one of those quotes where i indicate 9mh or FF explicitly says nine mile hole are directly referencing the nine mile hole.
And they aren't from the book they are from FF's bio.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Spoon View Post
That's a bunch of baloney. Your final quote is very specifically from the FLYWATER chapter of TTOTC. Your connection of that to 9MH comes only from your own imagination. When an experienced fly fisherman is REALLY talking about a fishing, he doesn't misspell caddis - twice. I can understand why his clever manipulation of words are over your head, but for goodness sakes, open your eyes! Use your critical thinking skills.
"Every one of those quotes where i indicate 9mh or FF explicitly says nine mile hole are directly referencing the nine mile hole."
Did I indicate the flywater quote was directly referencing 9mh? no. However, it did come after all the quotes about 9mh.
also the flywater quote is from the BIO. You should read it and put yourself in the know instead of PRETENDING you know what you are talking about.
"The Nine Mile Hole has always been my favorite." -fLast edited by Cary_Galloway; 05-21-2023, 11:51 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cary_Galloway View Post
read what i wrote again:
"Every one of those quotes where i indicate 9mh or FF explicitly says nine mile hole are directly referencing the nine mile hole."
Did I indicate the flywater quote was directly referencing 9mh? no. However, it did come after all the quotes about 9mh.
also the flywater quote is from the BIO. You should read it and put yourself in the know instead of PRETENDING you know what you are talking about.
"The Nine Mile Hole has always been my favorite." -f
Comment
-
Suppose that Rudy’s stick is the same as the the stick on the first find photo.
Suppose that the first find photo was taken by Jack.
Then my first question would be: How did Rudy get in the possession of that stick? Or, who gave this stick to Rudy? And why?
Another question. Why do we only hear Cary here and not Rudy himself?
- Likes 3
Comment
Comment