Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

200ft vs 500ft

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Cary_Galloway View Post

    Do you believe it was found within 50 miles of West Yellowstone?
    Do you believe it was found in Wyoming?
    Do you believe it was found in Yellowstone?
    Do you believe Jack found the chest?
    So the suncalc.com didn't help you I guess?

    No
    Yes
    No
    Yes, but I don't think he solved all the clues.

    I'll tell you where I think it was found . See right in the center of the photo where it looks like water coming from the rocks? Within several steps of that.
    Attached Files

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by [email protected] View Post
      It was not found with in 50 miles of west Yellowstone,it was found in Wyoming,not in Yellowstone park, Jack got the chest, I don’t know if he had help from Forrest. Nine mile hole has nothing but people who thought Forrest was giving special hints,he had their number. I think we all know who they are. Clint
      In all this time, I know as much about your solution as I do RahRah ’s. You both say I’ll ‘know what you know’ when I ‘see what you see’ in the most arcane, crypto roundabout nothingness snake oil ways possible; though neither wants to actually say anything potentially Helpful or Informative as to your above-top-secret-secret-solve location(s).
      No worries. Most on here are trying to defend their solves. I’m just defending your right(s) to Have a solve whether you actually say something useful about it or not. What do I know? Also, you’re right. ‘we all’ know who ‘they’ are. Those number known people.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by Cary_Galloway View Post

        you guys have been here for YEARS and you can't even agree on the very first clue!
        This Chase is a consensus now? Where do I place my ballot? Can I vote absentee, cuz I’m hecka far from NMH, and only nominally closer to the correct location

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by Rose Livingstone View Post
          In all this time, I know as much about your solution as I do RahRah ’s. You both say I’ll ‘know what you know’ when I ‘see what you see’ in the most arcane, crypto roundabout nothingness snake oil ways possible; though neither wants to actually say anything potentially Helpful or Informative as to your above-top-secret-secret-solve location(s).
          No worries. Most on here are trying to defend their solves. I’m just defending your right(s) to Have a solve whether you actually say something useful about it or not. What do I know? Also, you’re right. ‘we all’ know who ‘they’ are. Those number known people.
          I have posted numerous things to work with, literal nuggets of how to work with the clues in the poem - if you don't recognize them, that's not my problem.
          Lost Time is never found again. - Benjamin Franklin​

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Zapster View Post

            I posted it here last summer, but it'll be faster for me to repost the annotated image than find my original post:

            Click image for larger version

Name:	Treasure_Chest_in_hole-annotated.jpg
Views:	265
Size:	147.8 KB
ID:	513058
            The red arrow would be the direction of north if the chest had been butted up against the infamous log at Rudy's location. (I've added some overly generous orange error bars to indicate the uncertainty of the exact direction the log is pointed combined with any small angular misalignment that might have existed between the log and the back of the chest.)

            The green vector shows the corresponding direction of the sun at Rudy's location on the morning of June 5th, 2020 at 7:45 am MDT -- again under the assumption that the chest was butted up against that log. As with the uncertainty in the direction of true north, I've indicated the same uncertainty in the direction of azimuth 87.

            You might ask, "Why 7:45am? That seems awfully specific, particularly when we don't know the time of day the picture was taken." The answer is that from the shadows (particularly the one on the inside back right corner of the chest), I approximated that the sun was 30 degrees above the horizon, and determined the time in the morning that the sun reached that elevation. Could have been a little earlier, but not by much since otherwise the shadows would be longer and/or the sun would be blocked by the mountains to the east-northeast. It could have been later, but that just makes the photographic mismatch even worse as it would rotate the green vector further clockwise.

            Finally, the yellow vector points to where I estimate the actual sun was located at the time of the shot based on the shadows on the left side of the coins and the shadow cast by the right side of the treasure chest. That location is a good 60 degrees away from where the sun should have been if the chest was at Rudy's log. (It's also an impossible direction for the sun even at sunrise on the summer solstice at the latitude of 9MH.

            The only way Rudy's log location could be made to work is if the chest had been removed from its hole, rotated 90 degrees counterclockwise, and then placed back in the hole and photographed. But in that case, you wouldn't be able to open the lid: the log above would prevent that. In fact, that's the reason the chest lid wasn't opened all the way up for the picture: the top of the chest is hitting the log, preventing it from being opened any further.
            What is the significance of this? You assumed the orientation of the chest in the photo. If your analysis is valid, that just indicates that your starting assumption was incorrect. It does not indicate that the photo was taken somewhere other than 9MH.

            At the same time, there are 4 other photos from Jack, all of which contain matching features that have been found at the 9MH spot. Are you suggesting that the 5th photo was taken at a different spot than all the others? That would be quite strange.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Vertigo View Post

              What is the significance of this? You assumed the orientation of the chest in the photo. If your analysis is valid, that just indicates that your starting assumption was incorrect. It does not indicate that the photo was taken somewhere other than 9MH.

              At the same time, there are 4 other photos from Jack, all of which contain matching features that have been found at the 9MH spot. Are you suggesting that the 5th photo was taken at a different spot than all the others? That would be quite strange.
              It was staged, that's why it took 10 days to get the pictures.
              If you don’t want to do that, please go out someplace and plant a tree. f

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by Vertigo View Post

                What is the significance of this? You assumed the orientation of the chest in the photo. If your analysis is valid, that just indicates that your starting assumption was incorrect. It does not indicate that the photo was taken somewhere other than 9MH.

                At the same time, there are 4 other photos from Jack, all of which contain matching features that have been found at the 9MH spot. Are you suggesting that the 5th photo was taken at a different spot than all the others? That would be quite strange.
                This betrays a strange lack of familiarity with both the site you are trying to promote and the arguments that have been made against it. The orientation of Rudy's "nook" is not an assumption.

                The only problem with the solve about a fish is that the sun don't shine that way. From the Rudy video, the log is oriented very close to North-South. You can watch the video, look at a map and prove this it true. That means the front of the chest was facing due east. https://youtu.be/MzthoGTjNac Then you can look at the

                Comment


                • #68
                  Hi Rose Livingstone
                  RahRah said it for me ,if you can’t recognize what is in front of you ,I could help you by giving you all the answers but what’s the fun in that. What I am willing to give you is this, in the park starts the right canyon down ,the end of this canyon is not in the park the clues home of Brown and the rest of the clues if you can recognize them.Oh yah if you find this canyon you was a 500fter. I gave you a lot that I had to figure out on my own think your way through. The pictures below will help if you can figure it out.The picture in the middle is where the chest was.Clint

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by [email protected] View Post
                    Hi Rose Livingstone
                    RahRah said it for me ,if you can’t recognize what is in front of you ,I could help you by giving you all the answers but what’s the fun in that. What I am willing to give you is this, in the park starts the right canyon down ,the end of this canyon is not in the park the clues home of Brown and the rest of the clues if you can recognize them.Oh yah if you find this canyon you was a 500fter. I gave you a lot that I had to figure out on my own think your way through. The pictures below will help if you can figure it out.The picture in the middle is where the chest was.Clint
                    Thank you for posting these photos. I don't have TFTW and I've looked back for these pictures from time to time... think I'll save them this time. Would it be too much trouble for you to show a pic of the rest of the story?

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by [email protected] View Post
                      Hi Rose Livingstone
                      RahRah said it for me ,if you can’t recognize what is in front of you ,I could help you by giving you all the answers but what’s the fun in that. What I am willing to give you is this, in the park starts the right canyon down ,the end of this canyon is not in the park the clues home of Brown and the rest of the clues if you can recognize them.Oh yah if you find this canyon you was a 500fter. I gave you a lot that I had to figure out on my own think your way through. The pictures below will help if you can figure it out.The picture in the middle is where the chest was.Clint
                      I have my own solve though I haven’t posted it yet, nor seen anything close online. I’ve read the books and the scrapbooks and seen the interviews etc. Simply repeating information that’s already out there is not hinting at nuggets or whatever- it’s just making a list of the information you found helpful in your solve. Nothing wrong with that, not everyone wants to post on their solve, I just enjoy reading other people’s solves and interesting thoughts that people Are willing to share even if Chase tangent. If y’all wanna keep everything to yourselves, that’s fine, but that’s exactly what it is and I call it like I see it. It’s cool to me to figure out How people think and various solves are a good way to do that. But simply listing which pieces of public info you used isn’t enough to gain insight into Anything really, just as repeating a F quote in italics doesn’t alter its original words. It tells me You found that quote interesting, but no information on why.
                      If I was smart enough to read minds I’d probably be trying to prevent war or something. Instead my hobbies are learning about rabbit holes and putting together psychology puzzles which keeps me half sane most days. (shrug). You do you.

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Rose Livingstone
                        you can lead a horse to water but can’t make you see what’s in front of you. If you look at the bottom of page 100 TFTW you will see a boot and part of a leg,Forrest said he would throw or fling himself on the chest at the book signing. Middle picture in above post. You’re welcome. Clint

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Gunrunner Hi
                          Here is the rest of the story . Clint

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Originally posted by [email protected] View Post
                            Gunrunner Hi
                            Here is the rest of the story . Clint
                            Hi! Thanks!

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X