You seem to have a lot of oPinions into FF"s motivations, so I thought I'd ask you a couple of questions.
You've stated previously that you don't think FF left the goodies where the poem leads. There may be some good reason to do it that way, and I'm good with all of that. Over the years, I don't think that FF ever saw anyone get really close to solving the poem. There were possibly a lot of erroneous solves, so it wasn't an issue. But, there is just one thing that I'm puzzled about, that frankly bothers me. If the goodies were not where the poem leads, according to your theories, then what was to be done if FF was no longer around when the poem was solved? Alternatively, what if there were a searcher who solved the poem, but never emailed FF, and FF had no idea what was going on behind the scenes? The conclusion that I draw is that there is SOMETHING at the hidey spot that gives further instructions as to what to do. What do you think?
Good luck to you.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think that Fenn could achieve his 2 goals with no trove being hidden. His goals were
1. Getting people searching
2. Achieving some notoriety/"immortality" for himself.
He has done these things. Regarding whether the trove wasn't found while he's still alive, the poem provides plausible deniability. Here's how that can work: When a clever searcher has solved the
first few (say, about 4 or 5) clues and travelled to the location indicated by them, and is looking for the blaze, several items appear qualified as being the blaze by "standing out". So if one of them is
scrupulously and thoroughly pursued per the poem (i.e., "looking quickly down" after finding the blaze), of course the trove won't be found if it's not there. In turn, each of the other prospective "blazes" may be tried/tested in a similar manner, with similar results (no prize for you, sucker!). I don't guess that it's highly likely that one search team would try all of the items. But even if he/she
did, and (still) found no trove, complaining -- to who? -- would hardly help or prove anything. Other searchers would "pooh-pooh" the solve. And Fenn's achievement of his 2 goals would still stand.
It may be that his reputation is being a bit tarnished these days due to the lawsuit(s), but he has made his mark nonetheless, regardless of ethics or lack of ethics involved. And I won't apologize to
anyone for what I say about all this. Still, I wish good health and a reasonably-deserved bit of happiness to all involved.
You've stated previously that you don't think FF left the goodies where the poem leads. There may be some good reason to do it that way, and I'm good with all of that. Over the years, I don't think that FF ever saw anyone get really close to solving the poem. There were possibly a lot of erroneous solves, so it wasn't an issue. But, there is just one thing that I'm puzzled about, that frankly bothers me. If the goodies were not where the poem leads, according to your theories, then what was to be done if FF was no longer around when the poem was solved? Alternatively, what if there were a searcher who solved the poem, but never emailed FF, and FF had no idea what was going on behind the scenes? The conclusion that I draw is that there is SOMETHING at the hidey spot that gives further instructions as to what to do. What do you think?
Good luck to you.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think that Fenn could achieve his 2 goals with no trove being hidden. His goals were
1. Getting people searching
2. Achieving some notoriety/"immortality" for himself.
He has done these things. Regarding whether the trove wasn't found while he's still alive, the poem provides plausible deniability. Here's how that can work: When a clever searcher has solved the
first few (say, about 4 or 5) clues and travelled to the location indicated by them, and is looking for the blaze, several items appear qualified as being the blaze by "standing out". So if one of them is
scrupulously and thoroughly pursued per the poem (i.e., "looking quickly down" after finding the blaze), of course the trove won't be found if it's not there. In turn, each of the other prospective "blazes" may be tried/tested in a similar manner, with similar results (no prize for you, sucker!). I don't guess that it's highly likely that one search team would try all of the items. But even if he/she
did, and (still) found no trove, complaining -- to who? -- would hardly help or prove anything. Other searchers would "pooh-pooh" the solve. And Fenn's achievement of his 2 goals would still stand.
It may be that his reputation is being a bit tarnished these days due to the lawsuit(s), but he has made his mark nonetheless, regardless of ethics or lack of ethics involved. And I won't apologize to
anyone for what I say about all this. Still, I wish good health and a reasonably-deserved bit of happiness to all involved.
Comment